Interactive demo
Disruptiveness scoring
Seeded from this week's #1 paper. Drag factors to recompute the composite — same five-axis model used on cards and articles.
Calibrated to
Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning
arXiv:2609.04194 · editorial 93/100
Heuristic v1.1 · 10 topic-signal hits (3 in title), 0 boost phrases, claim=yes, practical=no. Cohort-calibrated to 93 (rank 1/20).
composite 84/100
Δ -9 vs editorial
Is this a new idea, proof, architecture, or measurement — or a small delta?
If true, how much do roadmaps, products, or theory change?
How active is this subfield right now on arXiv and in labs?
Can someone act on this soon — devices, code, trials — or is it pure theory?
Does it challenge orthodoxy or invite healthy debate? (Not drama for its own sake.)
Scores are triage, not peer review. See methodology · open this paper · curation demo.